Sunday, June 9, 2013

A reflection on image of God

A Sermon for III Pentecost All Saints’ Episcopal Church, Southern Shores, NC June 9, 2013 Thomas E. Wilson, Rector
Today’s worship service is different than you are used to. I wanted to share with you the worship service that we used during the dream retreat Pat and I were on two weeks ago. It is an adaptation from the Iona Abbey Worship Book. The Iona Abbey Community, centered on the island of Iona off the coast of the Scottish Hebrides, is an ecumenical Christian group heavily influenced by Celtic Christianity. Much of our Western Christianity is focused in the separation of the world from Heaven, on hierarchy of power with authority being bestowed from above, clergy being rulers (that is what the title “Rector” means) over the lay people, strict order, distrust of women, and a focus on creedal statements, sin, and punishment.

Celtic Christianity was in Britain brought by traders from the east who came for the tin mines used in the making of bronze, before the Roman Church in the form of Augustine arrived there centuries later and is focused on the belief that God is ever present, that heaven and the world are separated only by a thin porous veil called “thin places”, that authority comes from one’s own interior journey and relationship with God, on the honoring of the feminine, on all people being equal before God, and on the emphasis of wider belief parameters, freer and more interior worship, Grace, nature and blessings.

I want you to notice
(1) that the Affirmation of Faith is not a creedal statement of belief in theological forums but about living a life of relationship with the divine.
(2)The confession and absolution is reciprocal not just from the hierarchy.
(3) I want you to notice also the blessing. It is not the blessing that I give to you but the blessings we give each other as we point to all the blessing which surround us.

The lectionary stories in our worship service today have to do with an exposure to a different view of God. Today we have different stories: one about a widow of Zarephath and her son who is brought back to life by the prophet Elijah, the second about the raising of the widow of Na’in’s son by Jesus. These two stories dovetail with Paul’s introduction of himself in the Letter to the Galatians about how his faith had been given new life. First of all, you need to understand about the ancient culture and its view of widows, women, and sons. A woman was property which belonged to the oldest male relative, her father or her husband, and in the absence of either father or husband, she belonged to her son. The widows who are not named - the writers want to tell you something with that omission - have no real identity of their own because their sons, their hope and their comfort in old age, have died. In that ancient society’s view, widows were fair game to be used by predators.

Elijah, the prophet we met in last week’s Hebrew Testament lesson, was in the competition with the Priests of Ba’al. Let’s fill you in on Ba’al, the deity of the people of Sidon, who was brought in to Israel when Ahab married Jezebel from Sidon. Ba’al means Lord or Master, and he was so called because he was considered the Patron of the city, the God of war and thunder. Ancients tended to use archetypal metaphors for the most dangerous predators in their lives to give image to the idea of the numinous. Think of the metaphors used: the Lion and the Crocodile in Africa, the Thunderbolt maker Zeus in Greek mythology, the Elephant in Asia, the Killer Whale of the Pacific Northwest indigenous tribes, the serpent in Mesoamerica, the shark in Polynesia, even the Eagle in the United States. These metaphors for understanding the nature of the relationship with God are meant to demonstrate that we are to live in fear of our Gods, our predators, and we must placate the Gods or disaster will come to the people. The metaphors used tell us more about the people than they do about the deity in whose image they are made.

The problem with religion is that we spend a lot of time and spill a lot of blood trying to nail down definitions of that which cannot be defined, as Voltaire wrote in his notebooks, “If God has made us in his image, we have returned him the favor.” We tend to become what we adore. A God in the form of a wrathful Judge tends to create wrathful judges. A God of war tends to resonate with followers who worship violence. Male Gods tend to give the message that the male is the only acceptable icon of God.

Elijah and Jesus present a new metaphor for the relationship between humans and the God that lives within him and in the widows and sons. Elijah and Jesus point not to a vindictive God who rains famine and misfortune on those with whom he is displeased but to a divine energy of healing and wholeness freely given. Paul in the Galatians passage says that the God he worshiped was one of regimentation and order, but he was introduced to the God of freedom and love by Jesus.
You have heard, no doubt, of my earlier life in Judaism. I was violently persecuting the church of God and was trying to destroy it. I advanced in Judaism beyond many among my people of the same age, for I was far more zealous for the traditions of my ancestors. But when God, who had set me apart before I was born and called me through his grace, was pleased to reveal his Son to me, so that I might proclaim him among the Gentile

Today we are thanking the teachers of our children not for the dogma that they taught but for the love they made manifest in their lives of the children. We give thanks for our graduates who we send off to college, and we ask them to proclaim God by being open to the Holy Spirit and by showing love and grace. Anselm in the 11th century said: “God is greater than that which can be imagined and if we can define it: that which we define is not God.” Having that insight, we might want to take a moment to ask “What images do we use for God?” Jesus never took on the title of God and he always asked people to look through him to see the God of love, the ground of his and their and our being.

What images are you using for God? Whose image are you in?

No comments:

Post a Comment